ARTICLE: 'The processes at the FBI were contrived to fit people biased in favor of Clinton'

Saturday, July 14, 2018

Former FBI lawyer Lisa Page has been praised for her 'cooperative' performance at a closed door congressional hearing on Friday, as some Republicans say her testimony confirmed their suspicions of bias.

Page and her former lover, Peter Strzok, are facing the hearings after text messages sent between the pair revealed their hard anti-Trump stance.

The pair were working on Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 Presidential election, and an investigation into Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton's emails.

Page - whose affair with Strzok has led Trump to dub them the 'FBI lovers' - struck a deal with the House Judiciary Committee to testify privately after months of attempts to haul her before Congress, including defying a subpoena to testify publicly this week.

Read the full article here: 'The processes at the FBI were contrived to fit people biased in favor of Clinton'

P-B

YOUTUBE: Exchange between Rep. Trey Gowdy and FBI agent Peter Strzok

Friday, July 13, 2018

Length: 00:28:14

What's going on here is very interesting: Trey Gowdy is asking some very general questions about the Russia investigation, in terms of how it originated.  But Peter Strzok refuses to answer the question, stating that the FBI will not allow him to answer, which is complete nonsense.   Trey Gowdy is an EXTREMELY accomplished prosecutor, and is trying to find out the truth about the Russia collusion allegations, but Peter Strzok, with the tremendous help of the Democrats in the chamber, are doing EVERYTHING THEY CAN to prevent an answer to be given.

Here's a very important question to ask yourself:  Why would would the Democrats not want ANY information about the origin of the Russia collusion investigation to be known?

The question of the number of people interviewed is not going to cause any problems to the investigation, unless, of course, the answer to that question is ZERO.

I guarantee that Trey Gowdy knows, for a fact, that the answer, is ZERO.   Good prosecutors always know the exact answer to these questions before they ask them, and he's giving Strzok the opportunity to come clean.  The TREMENDOUS amount of obstruction on display here is to make sure that the answer of "ZERO" is never heard.

The point being, that Peter Strzok, who is the ORIGINATOR of the Russia collusion investigation, never had any evidence, nor any basis in fact, for opening the investigation to begin with.    A good prosecutor always has a series of interviews and a big pile of evidence handy before an official investigation is begun.  Otherwise, the FBI (or any other police agency) could have official investigations into just about anything they wanted to, whether or not there's a hint of evidence for their meddling.  Investigations without any basis of wrongdoing are known as "fishing expeditions".

P-B